🔗 Share this article

An activist organization has stated to have harvested a vast number of songs from the popular streaming service and is preparing to release them online.

Potential Boost for AI Development

Observers said the apparent leak could aid artificial intelligence firms looking for material to train their models.

An entity known as Anna’s Archive said it had scraped 86 million audio tracks from the platform and 256 million rows of associated data such as artist and album names. The company, which carries more than 100 million songs, confirmed that the leak did not represent its full inventory.

“We have identified and deactivated the malicious user accounts that were involved in illegal scraping,” stated a Spotify spokesperson.

The Swedish service, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, added that an investigation into unauthorized access found a external actor collected public metadata and used questionable tactics to circumvent DRM [digital rights management].

Group's Declared Mission and Concerns

The streaming service does not believe the audio acquired by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for providing links to copyright-infringing books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

The group claimed the music files represented 99.6% of all music listened to by its listeners and would be shared via ‘torrents’, a means of exchanging large data files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic beginning,” said Anna’s Archive, which frames its mission as “safeguarding humanity’s knowledge and heritage”.

AI Training and Copyright Battleground

Ed Newton-Rex for defending artists’ rights, remarked the breached music would probably be utilized for training artificial intelligence systems.

“Training on illegally sourced data is sadly common in the tech sector, so this stolen music is almost certain to be used training AI models,” he stated.

The group's website makes references to LibGen, a vast online archive of pirated books that has allegedly been used by Meta to train its AI models.

The co-founder of an AI startup wrote on the professional network that individuals of the public could in principle “build their own private free equivalent of Spotify”. He said it could also allow tech companies to “educate models on modern music at scale”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a key issue between artists, writers and creatives on one side and tech giants on the other.

Policy Considerations and Responses

Across Britain, artists and writers have raised concerns against a ministerial proposal to let AI companies use protected work without permission unless the rights holder signals. Almost every participant to a government consultation on the idea has backed artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for science, research and development told parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the matter, adding that ministers would “use the time to get this correct”. The administration has committed to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.